@article{oai:ynu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000720,
 author = {平出, 彦仁 and 井上, 裕光},
 journal = {横浜国立大学教育紀要},
 month = {Oct},
 note = {application/pdf, In our daily life, it is reasonable that we would use our knowledge out of necessity. Concerning the problem of KNOWLEDGE AND CONCEPT, we would face to the asumption, when to use and what to drive them. But psychological researches have been to indifferent to the case, and so rarely discussed the previous a priori methods. Statisticians, however, come to a conclusion that many psychological studies are lack of the validity, reliability, reproductivity. In particular, the method of KNOWLEDGE AND CONCEPT research is lack of a viewpoint from "individual differences". It is also the theme of educational psychology. This article is a selective study to discuss the "individual differences" in the case of CATEGORY research, against the "mean method - Generalization". Here take the alternative analysis "DUAL SCALING" to the previous one. It is meant that to examine methodologically its utilization could tell us the following research.},
 pages = {141--150},
 title = {知識・概念研究のための方法論的検討(I) : カテゴリー内容の分析について},
 volume = {27},
 year = {1987}
}