@article{oai:ynu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00011422,
 author = {Akira, S Mori and Laura E  Dee and Andrew  Gonzalez and Haruka  Ohashi and Jane  Cowles and Alexandra J  Wright and Michel  Loreau and Yann  Hautier and Tim  Newbold and Peter B  Reich and Tetsuya  Matsui and Wataru Takeuchi and Kei-ichi  Okada and Rupert  Seidl and Forest, Isbell},
 journal = {Nature climate change},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {The global impacts of biodiversity loss and climate change are interlinked, but the feedbacks between them are rarely assessed. Areas with greater tree diversity tend to be more productive, providing a greater carbon sink, and biodiversity loss could reduce these natural carbon sinks. Here, we quantify how tree and shrub species richness could affect biomass production on biome, national and regional scales. We find that GHG mitigation could help maintain tree diversity and thereby avoid a 9–39% reduction in terrestrial primary productivity across different biomes, which could otherwise occur over the next 50 years. Countries that will incur the greatest economic damages from climate change stand to benefit the most from conservation of tree diversity and primary productivity, which contribute to climate change mitigation. Our results emphasize an opportunity for a triple win for climate, biodiversity and society, and highlight that these co-benefits should be the focus of reforestation programmes.},
 pages = {543--550},
 title = {Biodiversity–productivity relationships are key to nature-based climate solutions},
 volume = {11},
 year = {2021}
}